Wednesday, 6 March 2013
Tuesday, 5 March 2013
Last week, on the blogger conference call Governor Perry pointed out that:
Washington is going to run out of money in 3-4 years, at which point the states will be on the hook for the full cost; that's when they're going to start pushing single-payer.That is a point that cannot be repeated often enough. Washington is going to run out of money. When that happens, the Medicaid burden will fall on states. When that happens, expanded Medicaid will be an economic anvil for participating states. States that resist the lure of Medicaid expansion today will reap tremendous benefits in 3 to 4 years when Washington runs out of money.
Expanding the current Medicaid system is an economic suicide pact.
"Colorado, what kind of pansy girls have you become?!?....We need some MEN in Texas." Glenn Beck, Radio, March 5 2013, Bottom of the First Hour.
Last night, this diary on Redstate made the rounds. It is a warning to Texans that Democrats can turn Texas blue the same way they turned Colorado blue in the mid-2000's. There is another aspect of this story, however, that Texas Republicans would be well served to remember.
In 2002, National Review named (then) Colorado Governor Bill Owens America's Best Governor. At the time, Owens had established a track record as a conservative reformer and he was re-elected by the largest margin in Colorado history. At the time, Colorado had a strict spending cap known called the Taxpayer Bill of Rights (TABOR); more on that in a minute. Then came the budget battle of 2003 and, specifically, a fight over school finance. During that battle, the left savaged Governor Owens.
Following that budget fight, Bill Owens lost his nerve. In 2005, Bill Owens sold his soul to the Democrats and backed Prop. C, which gutted TABOR. Gutting TABOR opened the floodgates of big government, and Colorado has since been hopelessly blue.
So, what does this mean for Republicans in Texas in 2013?!?
It means that money matters. Beyond the obvious flaws, big government is also a money laundering scheme for the Democrat party. When Colorado Republicans caved to the grow-government crowd, they signed their death warrant.
Ten days ago, we outlined big-ticket items for the 83rd Legislature: Texas Budget Compact, School Choice, Medicaid, Transparency, and Margins Tax Elimination. The reason these five reforms are big ticket items is that, over they long-run, each keeps money in the hands of citizens and out of the hands of government. Credit where its due, Texas Republicans had a good start to the week.
The key is to stay on public-policy offense. If Texas Republicans do that, they'll be fine. If they don't, they'll deserve what they get.
Update: A longtime Texas Political Observer writes in to add:
It's good to have outsiders such as the folks from Labor Union Report writing articles, if only to create a sense of urgency for action. However:
1) Unlike previous Democratic efforts in Texas that were built around remnants of Martin Frost’s congressional operation, Battleground Texas is almost entirely out-of-state talent. Texas’ political culture is unlike DC or virtually any other state. If you don't understand the history and the nuances, you're going to make a fool of yourself. Even a couple of weeks in, it's obvious that these folks don't get Texas.
2) The Right already has the seven capacities in place in Texas. In fact, once we saw what the Left had done in Colorado, our side immediately moved to ensure that those seven capacities existed in Texas. Colorado was their proof of concept, Texas is ours.
3) Texas Republicans have done far better with Hispanic voters than the party in most other states. If we can hang on to 35-40% of the Hispanic vote going forward, we'll be fine. Plus we're beginning to develop a good bench of Hispanic Republican officeholders throughout the state, including in heavily Hispanic regions.
4) To become the majority, Democrats have to make up 17 points at the statewide level, pick up 4 Senate seats when the only vulnerable one is theirs, and flip 21 House seats when their only real opportunities are in the cities of Dallas and Houston, which are declining in influence compared to their suburbs which are heavily Republican. They’ve maxed out in Austin, San Antonio, and El Paso, and the rural areas north of IH-10 are wholly conservative.
5) The Democrats have won zero statewide races since 1994 and have zero infrastructure outside the urban counties. Heck, there were close to 20 counties last year where they didn't conduct a primary because they couldn't find anyone willing to have their name listed as a county chairman. (The Republicans had primaries in all 254.) And the potentially viable statewide candidates in the Democrats’ pipeline can be counted on one hand.
6) The latest survey data indicates that 47 percent of Texans have “strongly unfavorable” opinions of the President.
If conservatives totally mess things up, Texas could turn purple in 2022. But it would have to be total.
Monday, 4 March 2013
Phew; Texas House Republicans voted overwhelmingly to support Governor Perry and not expand Medicaid.
I'll (still) take it.
Update II: Sunshine State Sarah (of Texas) reports more good news out of Florida.
Wow; according to RedState, Texas House Republicans are going wobbly on Obamacare:
Republican Texas State Representatives will [meet] at 1pm CT today consider caving on Obamacare.According to our sources, both inside and outside the legislature, that's not going to happen. Texas House Republicans seem to understand the folly of Medicaid expansion. Still, it never hurts to remind them how you feel.
First, contact YOUR legislator via the link above; also, we recommend you also contact House Speaker Joe Straus; the Texas House Speaker website doesn't give the number to his Capital Office, but you can reach his district office at (210) 828-4411.
Update: You can also reach the Speaker on Twitter: @speakerstraus
Empower Texans has more here.
Update II (7 pm): Texas House Republicans did the right thing.
Saturday, 2 March 2013
Highlights:
- Texas is 9% of the total U.S. landmass
- Texas is bigger than France!!!
- Texas had our own Declaration of Independence
Friday, 1 March 2013
Yesterday, we became aware of something called the 'National Sexuality Education Standards' that are under consideration in Chicago. Given that Marxists use sex as a recruiting device, we wanted to see what they were peddling to five year olds. It isn't good.
(Author's Note: You can download the relevant PDF here; all parenthetical references are to page numbers in that PDF)
To begin, "National Sexuality Education Standards" are only a minimum, which means that other bad things can be piled on top:
The goal of the National Sexuality Education Standards: Core Content and Skills, K-12 is to provide clear, consistent [emphasis mine], and straightforward guidance on the essential minimum [ital. in original, underline mine] core content for sexuality education that is developmentally and age appropriate for students in grades K - 12 (6)I would LOVE to know who gets to determine 'age and developmentally appropriate.'
Next, is an assault on local control:
Specifically, the National Sexuality Education Standards were developed to address the inconsistent implementation of sexuality education nationwide. (6)And the influence of Common Core:
The National Sexuality Education Standards were further informed by the work of....the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Mathematics, recently adopted by most states (6)One 'Role of Education Standards' is to:
Teach functional knowledge and essential personal and social skills that contribute directly to healthy sexuality. (8) [emphasis mine]How do you define 'functional' and 'essential'?!?
One 'Guiding Value and Principle' is that:
Instruction by qualified sexuality education teachers is essential for student achievement. [emphasis mine] (9)Who's handing out those qualifications?!?
Another 'Guiding Value and Principle' is that:
Students need opportunities to engage in cooperative and active learning strategies (9) [emphasis mine]Does 'cooperative and active' mean something like this?!?
The report goes on to outline the actual standards. A lot of this stuff is written in weasel language, so you have to read between the lines. But the stuff that's written clearly is bad enough.
Teaching five year olds to:
Identify different kinds of family structures (12)Teaching eight year olds to:
Define sexual orientation as the romantic attraction of an individual to someone of the same gender or a different gender. (14)While simultaneously promoting this trial lawyer boondoggle:
Define sexual harassment and sexual abuse. (15)By age 11, Children will be learning to:
Differentiate between gender identity, gender expression, and sexual orientation. (16)While also:
Define[ing] emergency contraception and its use (16)And teaching 'pregnancy options' (ie. abortion) at age 11 (16).
This is stuff is already in public schools, and it's only going to spread; forewarned is forearmed!!!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
